Acts 5:29
Acts 5:2929But Peter and the other apostles replied, “We must obey God rather than men.
The Watchtower cites frequently to justify Witnesses' refusal of state-mandated actions judged contrary to "Jehovah's commands" — including alternative civilian service before the 1996 policy reversal, blood transfusions, saluting the flag, and singing national anthems. The verse is used to frame obedience to the organisation as obedience to God, such that resisting Governing Body direction is re-cast as resisting Jehovah. In Watchtower usage, the "men" Peter refused to obey are always the outside civil authorities — never the elders, Circuit Overseer, or Governing Body themselves.
The NWT at reads: "We must obey God as ruler rather than men." Peter's principle cuts in exactly the opposite direction the Watchtower typically applies it: the "men" to be resisted in Acts 5 are the religious authorities who claim a divine mandate while contradicting God's word. Those authorities are the Sanhedrin — the very body the apostles were supposed to obey as "Jehovah's organisation" of the day. Raymond Franz documents that a Circuit Overseer told him plainly, "The Governing Body can overrule our conscience," and a District Overseer illustrated loyalty by saying that if the Society told him a green book was black, he would agree it was black (Crisis of Conscience, Ch. 11-12). lands against that posture, not for it. When the organisation can override conscience and declare the green book black, Peter's rule leaves only one choice: God or men. The verse is also decisive on the alternative-service question — Jesus in explicitly endorses state-compelled civilian service ("if someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two"), so no conflict ever existed for the young brothers who were imprisoned from the 1940s through 1996 under a policy the Governing Body's own majority had already voted to change in 1978. See organisation-vs-bible-authority, alternative-service-refusal, bonhoeffer-confessing-church, cosmic-neutrality-civic-cost.