1 Corinthians 13:10
1 Corinthians 13:1010but when the perfect comes, the partial passes away.
rs explicitly rejects the standard Reformed cessationist reading that "when the perfect comes" refers to the closed biblical canon. Instead, the rs book treats "the perfect" as a still-future eschatological reality. JW commentary thus leaves 13:10's cessation text in limbo — pointing to a future fulfilment rather than a past one — while the rs book simultaneously needs to argue that tongues have already ceased.
13:10 is where the rs argument breaks. The rs book (move #6) says "the perfect" is still future — which means tongues have not yet ceased by Paul's own timing. But rs (move #4) simultaneously claims tongues DID cease at the end of the apostolic era, on the basis of Acts 8 and 19. Both cannot be true. And breaks move #4 on its own — the Spirit fell on the Gentile household while Peter was still speaking, before any laying-on-of-hands. At the door: "If 'the perfect' is still future, when did tongues cease? And if they ceased because the apostolic channel did, what about Acts 10, where the Spirit falls without any apostolic mediation?"